Rwanda
IPA Rwanda opened an office in Kigali in 2013 and has partnered with the Rwandan government, academic institutions, and several private sector partners to generate evidence in agriculture, education, financial inclusion, health, and social protection. We have supported the use of data in public policy. With our partners, IPA Rwanda founded the Rwanda Embedded Lab to support evidence-driven education policy.
Contact Us
Physical Address: KK23 Avenue, Kicukiro, Kigali, Rwanda
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 6161, Kigali, Rwanda
Highlights
Discover more from IPA
View All Studies View All News View All Blogs View All Events View All Publications
Research Findings

Are Training Programs Better Than Cash Transfers At Improving The Lives Of Poor And Underemployed Young People? Evidence From Rwanda
Finding effective measures to integrate young people into productive adult life is crucial, especially given Africa's growing youth population. However, the evidence surrounding various policy alternatives is mixed, and there is no clarity on the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of the various alternatives. In Rwanda, researchers conducted a cash benchmarking evaluation, — a direct comparison of in-kind to cash transfer programs — of a workforce readiness and skills training program called Huguka Dukore. Both the Huguka Dukore program and cash transfers had a positive impact in the short and long term. However, the long-term effects faded by about half compared to the short-term.

Is A Pay-For-Performance Model For Teachers Effective In Improving Educational Outcomes? Evidence From Rwanda
The ability to recruit, elicit effort from, and retain civil servants is a central issue for any government. Can pay-for-performance contracts successfully maintain a skilled and motivated workforce? In Rwanda, researchers partnered with the Rwanda Education Board to design a pay-for-performance contract for teachers and measure its impact on both the composition of recruited teachers and their performance. The results showed that pay-for-performance contracts had no negative impact on teacher recruitment and had a positive impact on teacher performance, especially in classroom presence and pedagogy, as well as on student learning.

Benchmarking a WASH and Nutrition Program to Cash in Rwanda
How do standard development programs compare to just giving people cash? In Rwanda, an IPA research team rigorously evaluated the impact of unconditional cash transfers,1 compared to an integrated nutrition and WASH program, on the following main outcomes: household dietary diversity, child and maternal anemia, child growth (height-for-age, weight-for-age, mid-upper arm circumference), value of household wealth, and household consumption. After approximately one year,2 the nutrition and WASH program had a positive impact on savings, a secondary outcome, but did not impact any main outcomes. An equivalent amount of cash (a cost to USAID of $142 per household with $114 being transferred) allowed households to pay down debt and boosted productive and consumption asset investment, but had no impact on child health indicators. A much larger cash transfer—of more than $500 per household—had a wide range of benefits: it not only increased consumption, house values, savings, and assets, but improved household dietary diversity and height-for-age, and decreased child mortality.
Policy Impact
Embedded Lab
IPA Rwanda, Georgetown University Initiative on Innovation, Development and Evaluation (gui2de), and Rwanda Education Board founded the Rwanda Embedded Lab to support evidence-driven education policy. Its main objective is to support data-driven teacher recruitment and management.