UsingarandomizedevaluationinKenya, wemeasurehealthimpacts ofspring protection, an investment that improves source water quality. We also estimate households’ valuation of spring protection and simulate the welfare impacts of alternatives tothe current system of common property rights in water, which limits incentives for private investment. Spring infrastructure investments reduce fecal contamination by 66%, but household water quality improves less, due to recontamination. Child diarrhea falls by one quarter. Travel-cost based revealed preference estimates of households’ valuations are much smaller than both stated preference valuations and health planners’ valuations, and are consistent with models in which the demand for health is highly income elastic. We estimate that private property norms would generate little additional investment while imposing large static costs due to above-marginal-cost pricing, private property would function better at higher income levels or under water scarcity, andalternative institutions couldyieldParetoimprovements. JEL Codes: C93, H75, O13, Q25, Q51.

Michael KremerJessica LeinoEdward MiguelAlix Zwane
Publication type: 
Published Paper
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
March 27, 2015
Program area: